Received: from e55.webcom.com (e55.webcom.com [206.2.192.66]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.5/8.7.5-MZ) with ESMTP id IAA11058 for <DWARNER@ALBANY.NET>; Fri, 29 Mar 1996 08:41:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost by e55.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA071566392; Fri, 29 Mar 1996 05:33:12 -0800
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 05:33:12 -0800
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Message-Id: <199603291324.AA26725@xs1.xs4all.nl>
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: Daniel Dugour <anitime@xs4all.nl>
To: lightwave@e55.webcom.com
Subject: Re: Onyx jobs
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
>
>They offer me 15% of the animation cost for payment. I can't tell if this is a
>fair or not... On first thought, it is, because I will learn the package,
>OTOH, maybe it's not so good after a few months, what do you SGI experts say?!
>
>To all freelance (and non-freelance) animators that work with SGI:
>
>- Are those 15% fair?!
I would do it, if I were you, but haggle a bit about your future payment.
15% is OK if you're still learning to work with the package, and if you know
what they base the cost on, but later on I would go for something more
secure, like an hourly rate (I don't know how about the exchange rate of
your money to Dutch guilders, so I cannot give you any advice on that), with
overtime paid extra.
>- Is it bug free/productive?!
It is productive, but, like any other package I've worked with, not bug free
at all.
>
>- Isn't life great?! :)
Depends on which life you are referring to. Mine is OK.
